Unveiling the potential of a novel portable air quality platform for assessment of fine and coarse particulate matter: in-field testing, calibration, and machine learning insights.

Journal: Environmental monitoring and assessment
PMID:

Abstract

Although low-cost air quality sensors facilitate the implementation of denser air quality monitoring networks, enabling a more realistic assessment of individual exposure to airborne pollutants, their sensitivity to multifaceted field conditions is often overlooked in laboratory testing. This gap was addressed by introducing an in-field calibration and validation of three PAQMON 1.0 mobile sensing low-cost platforms developed at the Mining and Metallurgy Institute in Bor, Republic of Serbia. A configuration tailored for monitoring PM and PM mass concentrations along with meteorological parameters was employed for outdoor measurement campaigns in Bor, spanning heating (HS) and non-heating (NHS) seasons. A statistically significant positive linear correlation between raw PM and PM measurements during both campaigns (R > 0.90, p ≤ 0.001) was observed. Measurements obtained from the uncalibrated NOVA SDS011 sensors integrated into the PAQMON 1.0 platforms exhibited a substantial and statistically significant correlation with the GRIMM EDM180 monitor (R > 0.60, p ≤ 0.001). The calibration models based on linear and Random Forest (RF) regression were compared. RF models provided more accurate descriptions of air quality, with average adjR values for air quality variables in the range of 0.70 to 0.80 and average NRMSE values between 0.35 and 0.77. RF-calibrated PAQMON 1.0 platforms displayed divergent levels of accuracy across different pollutant concentration ranges, achieving a data quality objective of 50% during both measurement campaigns. For PM, uncertainty ( ) was below 50% for concentrations between 9.06 and 34.99 μg/m in HS and 5.75 and 17.58 μg/m in NHS, while for PM, it stayed below 50% from 19.11 to 51.13 μg/m in HS and 11.72 to 38.86 μg/m in NHS.

Authors

  • Dušan B Topalović
    Department of Radiation and Environmental Protection, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11001, Belgrade, Serbia. dusan.topalovic@vin.bg.ac.rs.
  • Viša M Tasić
    Mining and Metallurgy Institute Bor, Zeleni Bulevar 35, 19210, Bor, Serbia.
  • Jelena S Stanković Petrović
    Department of Radiation and Environmental Protection, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11001, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Jelena Lj Vlahović
    Department of Radiation and Environmental Protection, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11001, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Mirjana B Radenković
    Department of Radiation and Environmental Protection, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11001, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Ivana D Smičiklas
    Department of Radiation and Environmental Protection, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11001, Belgrade, Serbia.