Machine learning helps reveal key factors affecting tire wear particulate matter emissions.

Journal: Environment international
PMID:

Abstract

Tire wear particles (TWPs) are generated with every rotation of the tire. However, obtaining TWPs under real driving conditions and revealing key factors affecting TWPs are challenging. In this study, we obtained a TWPs dataset by simulating tire wear process under real driving conditions using a tire wear simulator and custom-designed test conditions. This study shows that tire wear PM accounts for about 65 % of PM. The response relationship between TWP emissions (both PM and PM) and factors (the radial force, the lateral force, the tangential force, speed, driving torque, tire contact area, total contour length and tire tread temperature) was obtained by machine learning (ML) method. The random forest (RF) model was developed and displayed good prediction performance with an R of 0.84 and 0.78 for PM and PM on the test set, respectively. Model-related (similarity network graph) and model-unrelated (partial dependence plots and centered-individual conditional expectation plots) explainability methods were used to break the black box of ML. Model explainability results show that the feature parameters-emission response relationships for tire wear PM and PM are different. Avoiding strenuous driving behaviors (TTF < 400 N, TLF < 400 N), reducing tread temperature (T < 45℃), and minimizing the number of small tread patterns are feasible ways to reduce TWPs.

Authors

  • Zhenyu Jia
    Department of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA. zhenyuj@ucr.edu.
  • Jiawei Yin
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 1st Floor, Nankai University Press, No.94 weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China.
  • Tiange Fang
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 1st Floor, Nankai University Press, No.94 weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China.
  • Zhiwen Jiang
    School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China.
  • Chongzhi Zhong
    China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co. Ltd, Tianjin 300300, China.
  • Zeping Cao
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 1st Floor, Nankai University Press, No.94 weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China.
  • Lin Wu
    Key Laboratory of Grain and Oil Processing and Food Safety of Sichuan Province, College of Food and Bioengineering, Xihua University Chengdu 610039 China xingyage1@163.com.
  • Ning Wei
    Jinchuan Group Information and Automation Engineering Co. Ltd., Jinchang 737100, China.
  • Zhengyu Men
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 1st Floor, Nankai University Press, No.94 weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China.
  • Lei Yang
    George Mason University.
  • Qijun Zhang
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 1st Floor, Nankai University Press, No.94 weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China. Electronic address: zhangqijun@nankai.edu.cn.
  • Hongjun Mao
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 1st Floor, Nankai University Press, No.94 weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China. Electronic address: hongjunm@nankai.edu.cn.