A study on the impact of meteorological and emission factors on PM concentrations based on machine learning.

Journal: Journal of environmental management
PMID:

Abstract

PM pollution, a major environmental and health concern, is influenced by a complex interplay of emission sources and meteorological conditions. Accurately identifying these factors and their contributions is essential for effective pollution management. This study applies Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) to identify primary sources of PM and uses the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) to quantitatively assess the impact of meteorological and emission factors on PM concentrations. SHAP results reveal that meteorological factors contribute 16.6% (5.3 μg/m) to PM, with humidity being the most influential, while emission sources account for 83.4% (26.8 μg/m), with secondary particulate matter being the dominant factor. Secondary particulate matter and biomass burning significantly impacted PM in the first and fourth quarters, while dust sources became more influential in the second quarter, and coal emissions were most prominent in the second and third quarters. Two-dimensional PDP analysis indicated that in the first and fourth quarters, secondary particulate matter concentration increased with air pressure, and the atmospheric oxidation process was more pronounced under high-humidity conditions during the day. Strong transport conditions, with wind direction shifting from north to east, also influenced secondary particulate matter levels. This study demonstrates that the LightGBM model effectively captures the nonlinear relationships between PM and meteorological and emission factors, providing a reliable approach for analyzing the causes of PM pollution.

Authors

  • Chenxu Zhao
    Department of Endocrinology, Peking University First Hospital, 100034, Beijing, China.
  • Zejian Lin
    Guangdong Key Lab of Water & Air Pollution Control, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Air Pollution Control, South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou, 510655, PR China.
  • Leifeng Yang
    Guangdong Key Lab of Water & Air Pollution Control, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Air Pollution Control, South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou, 510655, PR China.
  • Mengmeng Jiang
    Department of Radiology, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Fudan University, No 130, Dongan Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, P.R. of China.
  • Zhubing Qiu
    Anqing Ecological Environment Bureau, Anhui Province, Anqing, 246001, PR China.
  • Siyu Wang
    School of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sichuan, Chengdu, 610075, China. Electronic address: 919008390@qq.com.
  • Yu Gu
    Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.
  • Wei Ye
    AliveX Biotech, Shanghai, China.
  • Yusuo Pan
    Anqing Ecological Environment Monitoring Center, Anhui Province, Anqing, 246001, PR China.
  • Yong Zhang
    Outpatient Department of Hepatitis, The Sixth Affiliated People's Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
  • Tianxin Wang
    School of Advanced Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
  • Yong Jia
    Novartis Biomedical Research, 10675 John Jay Hopkins Drive, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.
  • Zhihang Chen
    Guangdong Key Lab of Water & Air Pollution Control, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Air Pollution Control, South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou, 510655, PR China. Electronic address: chenzhihang@scies.org.