SATINN v2: automated image analysis for mouse testis histology with multi-laboratory data integration†.

Journal: Biology of reproduction
Published Date:

Abstract

Analysis of testis histology is fundamental to the study of male fertility, but it is a slow task with a high skill threshold. Here, we describe new neural network models for the automated classification of cell types and tubule stages from whole-slide brightfield images of mouse testis. The cell type classifier recognizes 14 cell types, including multiple steps of meiosis I prophase, with an external validation accuracy of 96%. The tubule stage classifier distinguishes all 12 canonical tubule stages with external validation accuracy of 63%, which increases to 96% when allowing for ±1 stage tolerance. We addressed generalizability of SATINN, through extensive training diversification and testing on external (non-training population) wildtype and mutant datasets. This allowed us to use SATINN to successfully process data generated in multiple laboratories. We used SATINN to analyze testis images from eight different mutant lines, generated from three different labs with a range of tissue processing protocols. Finally, we show that it is possible to use SATINN output to cluster histology images in latent space, which, when applied to the eight mutant lines, reveals known relationships in their pathology. This work represents significant progress towards a tool for robust, automated testis histopathology that can be used by multiple labs.

Authors

  • Ran Yang
    Radiology Department, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing 404000, People's Republic of China.
  • Fritzie T Celino-Brady
    Division of Genetics, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
  • Jessica E M Dunleavy
    School of Biosciences and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Katinka A Vigh-Conrad
    Division of Genetics, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
  • Georgia R Atkins
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • Rachel L Hvasta
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • Christopher R X Pombar
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • Alexander N Yatsenko
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • Kyle E Orwig
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
  • Moira K O'Bryan
    School of Biosciences and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Ana C Lima
    Division of Genetics, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
  • Donald F Conrad
    Division of Genetics, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.