Comparing the Performance of Machine Learning Models and Conventional Risk Scores for Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Cerebrovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal: Journal of medical Internet research
Published Date:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) models may offer greater clinical utility than conventional risk scores, such as the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores. However, there is a lack of knowledge on whether ML or traditional models are better at predicting the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who have undergone percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

Authors

  • Min-Young Yu
    Graduate School of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Hae Young Yoo
    Red-Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseokro, Dongjak gu, Seoul, 06974, Republic of Korea, 82 2-820-5198.
  • Ga In Han
    Innovative Medical Technology Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea (Drs Jung, Ms Kang, Drs Son and H Lee, Ms Han, Ms Yoo, Drs Kwon, M Lee, and S Lee).
  • Eun-Jung Kim
    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyeongbuk, Republic of Korea.
  • Youn-Jung Son