Interspecies predictions of growth traits from quantitative transcriptome data acquired during fruit development.

Journal: Journal of experimental botany
Published Date:

Abstract

Linking genotype and phenotype is a fundamental challenge in biology. In this respect, machine learning is playing a pivotal role in systems biology. As central phenotypic traits, fruit development and relative growth rate (RGR) result from interactions between gene regulation, metabolism, and environment. In the present study, we carried out a multispecies transcriptomic analysis of nine different fruits. To illustrate fruit transcriptomes, transcripts were first compared using multivariate methods, revealing similar main profiles. They were then used as variables to predict four growth traits, that is RGR, developmental progress, fruit weight, and protein content, using generalized linear models to decipher the mechanisms involving gene expression in development. The predictions were highly satisfactory despite disparities when the model did not include the entire panel of fruit species. Based on orthogroups derived from BLAST and annotated consensus sequences from gene ontology terminology, variables annotated for metabolic processes, especially those involving cell wall carbohydrates and proteins, were found to be the most effective in predicting growth. In addition, predictions were improved for RGR when introducing a 7 d lag between transcript contents and growth traits, suggesting the necessity of considering the proteins produced to enhance phenotypic trait predictions. These original results showed that growth traits can be predicted very well with generalized linear models based on orthogroups from multi-species transcriptomes.

Authors

  • Chloé Beaumont
    Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, UMR 1332, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
  • Sylvain Prigent
    Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, UMR 1332, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
  • Kentaro Mori
    Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, UMR 1332, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
  • Pierre Baldet
    Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, UMR 1332, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
  • Joana Jorly
    Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, UMR 1332, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
  • Georges Randriafanomezantsoa-Radohery
    Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, UMR 1332, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
  • Bertrand Beauvoit
    Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, UMR 1332, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
  • Stéphanie Pateyron
    Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Université Evry, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France.
  • Etienne Delannoy
    Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INRAE, Université Evry, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France.
  • Pierre Pétriacq
    Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, UMR 1332, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
  • Yves Gibon
    Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, UMR 1332, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
  • Sophie Colombié
    Univ. Bordeaux, INRAE, Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, UMR 1332, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.