Dixon-VIBE Deep Learning (DIVIDE) Pseudo-CT Synthesis for Pelvis PET/MR Attenuation Correction.

Journal: Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
Published Date:

Abstract

Whole-body attenuation correction (AC) is still challenging in combined PET/MR scanners. We describe Dixon-VIBE Deep Learning (DIVIDE), a deep-learning network that allows synthesizing pelvis pseudo-CT maps based only on the standard Dixon volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (Dixon-VIBE) images currently acquired for AC in some commercial scanners. We propose a network that maps between the four 2-dimensional (2D) Dixon MR images (water, fat, in-phase, and out-of-phase) and their corresponding 2D CT image. In contrast to previous methods, we used transposed convolutions to learn the up-sampling parameters, we used whole 2D slices to provide context information, and we pretrained the network with brain images. Twenty-eight datasets obtained from 19 patients who underwent PET/CT and PET/MR examinations were used to evaluate the proposed method. We assessed the accuracy of the μ-maps and reconstructed PET images by performing voxel- and region-based analysis comparing the SUVs (in g/mL) obtained after AC using the Dixon-VIBE (PET), DIVIDE (PET), and CT-based (PET) methods. Additionally, the bias in quantification was estimated in synthetic lesions defined in the prostate, rectum, pelvis, and spine. Absolute mean relative change values relative to CT AC were lower than 2% on average for the DIVIDE method in every region of interest except for bone tissue, where it was lower than 4% and 6.75 times smaller than the relative change of the Dixon method. There was an excellent voxel-by-voxel correlation between PET and PET ( = 0.9998, < 0.01). The Bland-Altman plot between PET and PET showed that the average of the differences and the variability were lower (mean PET-PET SUV, 0.0003; PET-PET SD, 0.0094; 95% confidence interval, [-0.0180,0.0188]) than the average of differences between PET and PET (mean PET-PET SUV, 0.0006; PET-PET SD, 0.0264; 95% confidence interval, [-0.0510,0.0524]). Statistically significant changes in PET data quantification were observed between the 2 methods in the synthetic lesions, with the largest improvement in femur and spine lesions. The DIVIDE method can accurately synthesize a pelvis pseudo-CT scan from standard Dixon-VIBE images, allowing for accurate AC in combined PET/MR scanners. Additionally, our implementation allows rapid pseudo-CT synthesis, making it suitable for routine applications and even allowing retrospective processing of Dixon-VIBE data.

Authors

  • Angel Torrado-Carvajal
    Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
  • Javier Vera-Olmos
    Medical Image Analysis and Biometry Lab, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • David Izquierdo-Garcia
    Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
  • Onofrio A Catalano
    Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
  • Manuel A Morales
    Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
  • Justin Margolin
    Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
  • Andrea Soricelli
    SDN-Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare, IRCCS, Naples, Italy; and.
  • Marco Salvatore
    SDN-Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare, IRCCS, Naples, Italy; and.
  • Norberto Malpica
    Medical Image Analysis and Biometry Lab, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
  • Ciprian Catana
    Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts ccatana@mgh.harvard.edu.