Closed-loop cycles of experiment design, execution, and learning accelerate systems biology model development in yeast.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Published Date:

Abstract

One of the most challenging tasks in modern science is the development of systems biology models: Existing models are often very complex but generally have low predictive performance. The construction of high-fidelity models will require hundreds/thousands of cycles of model improvement, yet few current systems biology research studies complete even a single cycle. We combined multiple software tools with integrated laboratory robotics to execute three cycles of model improvement of the prototypical eukaryotic cellular transformation, the yeast () diauxic shift. In the first cycle, a model outperforming the best previous diauxic shift model was developed using bioinformatic and systems biology tools. In the second cycle, the model was further improved using automatically planned experiments. In the third cycle, hypothesis-led experiments improved the model to a greater extent than achieved using high-throughput experiments. All of the experiments were formalized and communicated to a cloud laboratory automation system (Eve) for automatic execution, and the results stored on the semantic web for reuse. The final model adds a substantial amount of knowledge about the yeast diauxic shift: 92 genes (+45%), and 1,048 interactions (+147%). This knowledge is also relevant to understanding cancer, the immune system, and aging. We conclude that systems biology software tools can be combined and integrated with laboratory robots in closed-loop cycles.

Authors

  • Anthony Coutant
    Le Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris-Nord (LIPN), UMR CNRS 7030, University Paris 13, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France.
  • Katherine Roper
    Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, M1 7DN Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Daniel Trejo-Banos
    Institute of Systems and Synthetic Biology (iSSB), CNRS UMR8030, University Paris-Saclay, Genopole, 91030 Evry, France.
  • Dominique Bouthinon
    Le Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris-Nord (LIPN), UMR CNRS 7030, University Paris 13, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France.
  • Martin Carpenter
    Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, M1 7DN Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Jacek Grzebyta
    Department of Computer Science, University of Brunel, UB8 3PH London, United Kingdom.
  • Guillaume Santini
    Le Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris-Nord (LIPN), UMR CNRS 7030, University Paris 13, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France.
  • Henry Soldano
    Le Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris-Nord (LIPN), UMR CNRS 7030, University Paris 13, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France.
  • Mohamed Elati
    Institute of Systems and Synthetic Biology (iSSB), CNRS UMR8030, University Paris-Saclay, Genopole, 91030 Evry, France.
  • Jan Ramon
    Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Celine Rouveirol
    Le Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris-Nord (LIPN), UMR CNRS 7030, University Paris 13, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France.
  • Larisa N Soldatova
    Brunel University, London, UK.
  • Ross D King
    3Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Division of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.