Semi-Automated evidence synthesis in health psychology: current methods and future prospects.

Journal: Health psychology review
Published Date:

Abstract

The evidence base in health psychology is vast and growing rapidly. These factors make it difficult (and sometimes practically impossible) to consider all available evidence when making decisions about the state of knowledge on a given phenomenon (e.g., associations of variables, effects of interventions on particular outcomes). Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and other rigorous syntheses of the research mitigate this problem by providing concise, actionable summaries of knowledge in a given area of study. Yet, conducting these syntheses has grown increasingly laborious owing to the fast accumulation of new evidence; existing, manual methods for synthesis do not scale well. In this article, we discuss how semi-automation via machine learning and natural language processing methods may help researchers and practitioners to review evidence more efficiently. We outline concrete examples in health psychology, highlighting practical, open-source technologies available now. We indicate the potential of more advanced methods and discuss how to avoid the pitfalls of automated reviews.

Authors

  • Iain J Marshall
    Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, UK iain.marshall@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Blair T Johnson
    Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
  • Zigeng Wang
    Computer Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
  • Sanguthevar Rajasekaran
    Computer Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
  • Byron C Wallace
    School of Information, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.