Deep-Learning-Derived Evaluation Metrics Enable Effective Benchmarking of Computational Tools for Phosphopeptide Identification.

Journal: Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP
PMID:

Abstract

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)-based phosphoproteomics is a powerful technology for global phosphorylation analysis. However, applying four computational pipelines to a typical mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomic dataset from a human cancer study, we observed a large discrepancy among the reported phosphopeptide identification and phosphosite localization results, underscoring a critical need for benchmarking. While efforts have been made to compare performance of computational pipelines using data from synthetic phosphopeptides, evaluations involving real application data have been largely limited to comparing the numbers of phosphopeptide identifications due to the lack of appropriate evaluation metrics. We investigated three deep-learning-derived features as potential evaluation metrics: phosphosite probability, Delta RT, and spectral similarity. Predicted phosphosite probability is computed by MusiteDeep, which provides high accuracy as previously reported; Delta RT is defined as the absolute retention time (RT) difference between RTs observed and predicted by AutoRT; and spectral similarity is defined as the Pearson's correlation coefficient between spectra observed and predicted by pDeep2. Using a synthetic peptide dataset, we found that both Delta RT and spectral similarity provided excellent discrimination between correct and incorrect peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) both when incorrect PSMs involved wrong peptide sequences and even when incorrect PSMs were caused by only incorrect phosphosite localization. Based on these results, we used all the three deep-learning-derived features as evaluation metrics to compare different computational pipelines on diverse set of phosphoproteomic datasets and showed their utility in benchmarking performance of the pipelines. The benchmark metrics demonstrated in this study will enable users to select computational pipelines and parameters for routine analysis of phosphoproteomics data and will offer guidance for developers to improve computational methods.

Authors

  • Wen Jiang
    School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710072, P.R. China.
  • Bo Wen
  • Kai Li
    Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  • Wen-Feng Zeng
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing, China.
  • Felipe da Veiga Leprevost
    Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Jamie Moon
    Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
  • Vladislav A Petyuk
    Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
  • Nathan J Edwards
    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Tao Liu
    Institute of Urology and Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  • Alexey I Nesvizhskii
    Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Bing Zhang
    School of Information Science and Engineering, Yanshan University, Hebei Avenue, Qinhuangdao, 066004, China.