Deep Learning Methods for Lung Cancer Segmentation in Whole-Slide Histopathology Images-The ACDC@LungHP Challenge 2019.

Journal: IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics
Published Date:

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of lung cancer in pathology slides is a critical step in improving patient care. We proposed the ACDC@LungHP (Automatic Cancer Detection and Classification in Whole-slide Lung Histopathology) challenge for evaluating different computer-aided diagnosis (CADs) methods on the automatic diagnosis of lung cancer. The ACDC@LungHP 2019 focused on segmentation (pixel-wise detection) of cancer tissue in whole slide imaging (WSI), using an annotated dataset of 150 training images and 50 test images from 200 patients. This paper reviews this challenge and summarizes the top 10 submitted methods for lung cancer segmentation. All methods were evaluated using metrics using the precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and DICE coefficient (DC). The DC ranged from 0.7354 ±0.1149 to 0.8372 ±0.0858. The DC of the best method was close to the inter-observer agreement (0.8398 ±0.0890). All methods were based on deep learning and categorized into two groups: multi-model method and single model method. In general, multi-model methods were significantly better (p 0.01) than single model methods, with mean DC of 0.7966 and 0.7544, respectively. Deep learning based methods could potentially help pathologists find suspicious regions for further analysis of lung cancer in WSI.

Authors

  • Zhang Li
    College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China.
  • Jiehua Zhang
  • Tao Tan
    Faculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
  • Xichao Teng
  • Xiaoliang Sun
  • Hong Zhao
    Key Laboratory of Medical Image Computing of Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
  • Lihong Liu
    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
  • Yang Xiao
  • Byungjae Lee
  • Yilong Li
  • Qianni Zhang
    Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Shujiao Sun
  • Yushan Zheng
    Image Processing Center, School of Astronautics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
  • Junyu Yan
  • Ni Li
  • Yiyu Hong
  • Junsu Ko
    Arontier, 241 Gangnam-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06735, Korea.
  • Hyun Jung
    Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States.
  • Yanling Liu
    Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States.
  • Yu-Cheng Chen
  • Ching-Wei Wang
  • Vladimir Yurovskiy
  • Pavel Maevskikh
  • Vahid Khanagha
  • Yi Jiang
    Institute of Genomic Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
  • Li Yu
    Key Laboratory of Colloid and Interface Chemistry, Shandong University, Ministry of Education, Jinan 250100, P. R. China. ylmlt@sdu.edu.cn.
  • Zhihong Liu
    National Clinical Research Center of Kidney Diseases, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
  • Daiqiang Li
  • Peter J Schüffler
    Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
  • Qifeng Yu
  • Hui Chen
    Xiangyang Central HospitalAffiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science Xiangyang 441000 China.
  • Yuling Tang
    Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Hospital of Changsha City, Changsha, China. tyl71523@qq.com.
  • Geert Litjens
    Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.