A joint deep learning model enables simultaneous batch effect correction, denoising, and clustering in single-cell transcriptomics.

Journal: Genome research
Published Date:

Abstract

Recent developments of single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) technologies have led to enormous biological discoveries. As the scale of scRNA-seq studies increases, a major challenge in analysis is batch effects, which are inevitable in studies involving human tissues. Most existing methods remove batch effects in a low-dimensional embedding space. Although useful for clustering, batch effects are still present in the gene expression space, leaving downstream gene-level analysis susceptible to batch effects. Recent studies have shown that batch effect correction in the gene expression space is much harder than in the embedding space. Methods such as Seurat 3.0 rely on the mutual nearest neighbor (MNN) approach to remove batch effects in gene expression, but MNN can only analyze two batches at a time, and it becomes computationally infeasible when the number of batches is large. Here, we present CarDEC, a joint deep learning model that simultaneously clusters and denoises scRNA-seq data while correcting batch effects both in the embedding and the gene expression space. Comprehensive evaluations spanning different species and tissues showed that CarDEC outperforms Scanorama, DCA + Combat, scVI, and MNN. With CarDEC denoising, non-highly variable genes offer as much signal for clustering as the highly variable genes (HVGs), suggesting that CarDEC substantially boosted information content in scRNA-seq. We also showed that trajectory analysis using CarDEC's denoised and batch-corrected expression as input revealed marker genes and transcription factors that are otherwise obscured in the presence of batch effects. CarDEC is computationally fast, making it a desirable tool for large-scale scRNA-seq studies.

Authors

  • Justin Lakkis
    Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
  • David Wang
    Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-aided Diagnosis Laboratory and Clinical Image Processing Service, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1182, USA.
  • Yuanchao Zhang
    Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
  • Gang Hu
    Ping An Health Technology, Beijing, China.
  • Kui Wang
    The Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
  • Huize Pan
    Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
  • Lyle Ungar
    University of Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Muredach P Reilly
    Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
  • Xiangjie Li
    Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
  • Mingyao Li
    Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. mingyao@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.