On the generalizability of diffusion MRI signal representations across acquisition parameters, sequences and tissue types: Chronicles of the MEMENTO challenge.

Journal: NeuroImage
Published Date:

Abstract

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) has become an invaluable tool to assess the microstructural organization of brain tissue. Depending on the specific acquisition settings, the dMRI signal encodes specific properties of the underlying diffusion process. In the last two decades, several signal representations have been proposed to fit the dMRI signal and decode such properties. Most methods, however, are tested and developed on a limited amount of data, and their applicability to other acquisition schemes remains unknown. With this work, we aimed to shed light on the generalizability of existing dMRI signal representations to different diffusion encoding parameters and brain tissue types. To this end, we organized a community challenge - named MEMENTO, making available the same datasets for fair comparisons across algorithms and techniques. We considered two state-of-the-art diffusion datasets, including single-diffusion-encoding (SDE) spin-echo data from a human brain with over 3820 unique diffusion weightings (the MASSIVE dataset), and double (oscillating) diffusion encoding data (DDE/DODE) of a mouse brain including over 2520 unique data points. A subset of the data sampled in 5 different voxels was openly distributed, and the challenge participants were asked to predict the remaining part of the data. After one year, eight participant teams submitted a total of 80 signal fits. For each submission, we evaluated the mean squared error, the variance of the prediction error and the Bayesian information criteria. The received submissions predicted either multi-shell SDE data (37%) or DODE data (22%), followed by cartesian SDE data (19%) and DDE (18%). Most submissions predicted the signals measured with SDE remarkably well, with the exception of low and very strong diffusion weightings. The prediction of DDE and DODE data seemed more challenging, likely because none of the submissions explicitly accounted for diffusion time and frequency. Next to the choice of the model, decisions on fit procedure and hyperparameters play a major role in the prediction performance, highlighting the importance of optimizing and reporting such choices. This work is a community effort to highlight strength and limitations of the field at representing dMRI acquired with trending encoding schemes, gaining insights into how different models generalize to different tissue types and fiber configurations over a large range of diffusion encodings.

Authors

  • Alberto De Luca
    From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Emma Children's Hospital-Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.R.v.R.); Department of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (A.D.L.); and Image Sciences Institute, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (A.D.L.).
  • Andrada Ianus
    Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Alexander Leemans
    PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Marco Palombo
    University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Noam Shemesh
    Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Hui Zhang
    Department of Pulmonary Vessel and Thrombotic Disease, Sixth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Daniel C Alexander
    Centre for Medical Image Computing and Dept of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
  • Markus Nilsson
    Clinical Sciences Lund, Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Martijn Froeling
    Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Geert-Jan Biessels
    Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Mauro Zucchelli
    Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • Matteo Frigo
    Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • Enes Albay
    Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France; Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Sara Sedlar
    Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • Abib Alimi
    Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • Samuel Deslauriers-Gauthier
    Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • Rachid Deriche
    Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France.
  • Rutger Fick
    TRIBVN Healthcare, Paris, France.
  • Maryam Afzali
    Cardiff University Brain Research, Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
  • Tomasz Pieciak
    AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland; LPI, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
  • Fabian Bogusz
    AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland.
  • Santiago Aja-Fernández
    LPI, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
  • Evren Özarslan
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Derek K Jones
    Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Haoze Chen
    School of Instruments and Electronics, North University of China, Taiyuan, China.
  • Mingwu Jin
    Department of Physics, University of Texas at Arlington, 502 Yates Street, Box 19059, Arlington, TX 76019, United States. Electronic address: mingwu@uta.edu.
  • Zhijie Zhang
    School of Instruments and Electronics, North University of China, Taiyuan, China.
  • Fengxiang Wang
    Department of Information and Telemedicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China 450052.
  • Vishwesh Nath
    Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Prasanna Parvathaneni
  • Jan Morez
    Imec-Vision lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Jan Sijbers
    Imec-Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, B-2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Ben Jeurissen
    Imec-Vision lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Shreyas Fadnavis
    Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
  • Stefan Endres
    Leibniz Institute for Materials Engineering - IWT, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
  • Ariel Rokem
    eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Eleftherios Garyfallidis
    Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
  • Irina Sanchez
    QMENTA Inc, Boston, USA.
  • Vesna Prchkovska
    QMENTA Inc, Boston, USA.
  • Paulo Rodrigues
    QMENTA Inc, Boston, USA.
  • Bennet A Landman
    Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
  • Kurt G Schilling
    Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.