Modularity maximization as a flexible and generic framework for brain network exploratory analysis.

Journal: NeuroImage
Published Date:

Abstract

The modular structure of brain networks supports specialized information processing, complex dynamics, and cost-efficient spatial embedding. Inter-individual variation in modular structure has been linked to differences in performance, disease, and development. There exist many data-driven methods for detecting and comparing modular structure, the most popular of which is modularity maximization. Although modularity maximization is a general framework that can be modified and reparamaterized to address domain-specific research questions, its application to neuroscientific datasets has, thus far, been narrow. Here, we highlight several strategies in which the "out-of-the-box" version of modularity maximization can be extended to address questions specific to neuroscience. First, we present approaches for detecting "space-independent" modules and for applying modularity maximization to signed matrices. Next, we show that the modularity maximization frame is well-suited for detecting task- and condition-specific modules. Finally, we highlight the role of multi-layer models in detecting and tracking modules across time, tasks, subjects, and modalities. In summary, modularity maximization is a flexible and general framework that can be adapted to detect modular structure resulting from a wide range of hypotheses. This article highlights multiple frontiers for future research and applications.

Authors

  • Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani
    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
  • Youngheun Jo
    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
  • Maria Grazia Puxeddu
    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering "Antonio Ruberti", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome 00179, Italy.
  • Haily Merritt
    Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
  • Jacob C Tanner
    Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
  • Sarah Greenwell
    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
  • Riya Patel
    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
  • Joshua Faskowitz
    Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
  • Richard F Betzel
    Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.