Comparison of partial least square, artificial neural network, and support vector regressions for real-time monitoring of CHO cell culture processes using in situ near-infrared spectroscopy.

Journal: Biotechnology and bioengineering
PMID:

Abstract

The biopharmaceutical industry must guarantee the efficiency and biosafety of biological medicines, which are quite sensitive to cell culture process variability. Real-time monitoring procedures based on vibrational spectroscopy such as near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, are then emerging to support innovative strategies for retro-control of key parameters as substrates and by-product concentration. Whereas monitoring models are mainly constructed using partial least squares regression (PLSR), spectroscopic models based on artificial neural networks (ANNR) and support vector regression (SVR) are emerging with promising results. Unfortunately, analysis of their performance in cell culture monitoring has been limited. This study was then focused to assess their performance and suitability for the cell culture process challenges. PLSR had inferior values of the determination coefficient (R ) for all the monitored parameters (i.e., 0.85, 0.93, and 0.98, respectively for the PLSR, SVR, and ANNR models for glucose). In general, PLSR had a limited performance while models based on ANNR and SVR have been shown superior due to better management of inter-batch heterogeneity and enhanced specificity. Overall, the use of SVR and ANNR for the generation of calibration models enhanced the potential of NIR spectroscopy as a monitoring tool.

Authors

  • Daniel A Zavala-Ortiz
    Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
  • Aurélia Denner
    Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
  • Maria G Aguilar-Uscanga
    Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz, Veracruz, Ver., México.
  • Annie Marc
    Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
  • Bruno Ebel
    Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
  • Emmanuel Guedon
    Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.