Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Journal: Neurosurgical focus
PMID:

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several approaches have been studied for internal fixation of the spine using pedicle screws (PSs), including CT navigation, 2D and 3D fluoroscopy, freehand, and robotic assistance. Robot-assisted PS placement has been controversial because training requirements, cost, and previously unclear benefits. This meta-analysis compares screw placement accuracy, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and overall complications of PS insertion using traditional freehand, navigated, and robot-assisted methods.

Authors

  • Anant Naik
    1Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign; and.
  • Alexander D Smith
    1Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign; and.
  • Annabelle Shaffer
    1Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign; and.
  • David T Krist
    1Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign; and.
  • Christina M Moawad
    1Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign; and.
  • Bailey R MacInnis
    1Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign; and.
  • Kevin Teal
    1Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign; and.
  • Wael Hassaneen
    1Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign; and.
  • Paul M Arnold
    1Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign; and.