Mid-term functional outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a single centre experience.

Journal: Journal of robotic surgery
PMID:

Abstract

For large prostate volume, open simple prostatectomy (OSP) or holmium laser enucleation are the gold standard surgical treatment medical therapy failure. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has recently been proposed as an alternative to OSP and endoscopic techniques. Our objective was to describe our extraperitoneal RASP technique for patients with benign prostate obstruction (BPO), and to report on perioperative and mid-term functional outcomes. Data were collected prospectively for all consecutive patients who underwent RASP in our high-volume tertiary hospital over a 6-year period. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and uroflow findings were compared before and after surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were also assessed. Forty-seven patients were included in the study. There was no intraoperative incident and no blood transfusion was needed after surgery. Median time to bladder catheter removal was 4 days and patients were discharged the day after. Within 90 postoperative days, 6 patients (12%) experienced at least one complication, all low-grade except one (2.1%) which was Clavien IIIa grade. By univariate analysis, the only risk factor for postoperative complications was the Charlson comorbidity index (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = [1.1-4.7], p = 0.04). At 12 months, a significant improvement IPSS and uroflow rate was observed. No patient reported stress urinary incontinence. Extraperitoneal RASP appears to be a safe and effective technique for men with LUTS related to large BPO. RASP is less invasive than OSP and wide diffusion of the robot-system could lead to the rapid implementation of RASP as a treatment for large prostate.

Authors

  • Alessio Paladini
    Division of Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, GRC 5, 75013, Paris, France.
  • Daniel Benamran
    Service d'urologie, Département de chirurgie, HUG, 1211 Genève 14.
  • Ugo Pinar
    "Service d'urologie de l'hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France".
  • Igor Duquesne
    Division of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Université de Paris, 75014, Paris, France.
  • Davy Benarroche
    Division of Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Urology, Sorbonne University, GRC 5, 75013, Paris, France.
  • Jérôme Parra
    Department of Urology, Médecine Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Christophe Vaessen
    Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
    Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpetrière Academic Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, Paris 6 University, Paris, France.
  • Thomas Seisen
    Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
  • Morgan Rouprêt
    Centre de Recherche sur les Pathologies Prostatiques, Paris, France; GRC No. 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.