Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology: A Critical Appraisal of the GECI and SIVI Consensus of European Experts.

Journal: Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A
Published Date:

Abstract

This study aimed to create a consensus statement on the indications, applications, and limitations of robotics in pediatric urology. After a panel and interactive discussion focused on pediatric robotics, a televoting with 10 questions was administered to 100 pediatric surgeons/urologists attending the joint meeting of the French Group of Pediatric Laparoscopy (GECI)/Italian Society of Videosurgery in Infancy (SIVI) in 2021. The results of televoting were analyzed electronically using Mentometer software. Ninety-four percent of participants stated that the cutoff weight for robotics should be >10-15 kg. A minimum of 20-30 procedures should be performed to become confident in robotics (74%). Pediatric urology is the main field of application (73%) and pyeloplasty is the best indication for robotics (63%). Technical problems may happen intraoperatively in 1/10-15 cases (64%). The mean duration of robotic procedures ranges from 150 to 200 minutes (72%). The main drawbacks of robotics are high costs and limited development of miniaturized instruments (74%). Ninety-five percent believed that the costs of robotics may significantly drop with the availability of more robotic brands. The main advantages of robotics over laparoscopy include improved dexterity, easier suturing, and better ergonomics (100%), whereas the main disadvantage of sharing the robot with other specialties is the wearing out of instruments (100%). This is the first consensus statement, endorsed by the GECI and SIVI societies, on the use of robotics in pediatric urology. The need to introduce more robotic brands on the market to lower the costs and to develop miniaturized instruments to be adopted in infants less than 10 kg emerged. Pediatric urology is the main field of application of pediatric robotics, and robotic pyeloplasty is the most common procedure performed. Proctorship is needed for the first 20-30 procedures and technical problems may occur intraoperatively in 1/10-15 cases. The main advantages of robotics over laparoscopy are improved dexterity, easier suturing, and better surgeon ergonomics.

Authors

  • Ciro Esposito
    Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Medical Science, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.
  • Thomas Blanc
    Sorbonne Université, Collège Doctoral, Paris, France.
  • Hubert Lardy
    Service de chirurgie viscérale pédiatrique, Hôpital de Clocheville, Tours, France.
  • Lorenzo Masieri
  • Laurent Fourcade
    Service de chirurgie viscérale pédiatrique, Hôpital des Enfants, Limoges, France.
  • Mario Mendoza-Sagaon
    Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • Simona Nappo
    Division of Pediatric Urology, Regina Margherita Hospital, Turin, Italy.
  • Manuel Lopez
    Division of Pediatric Surgery, Val d'Hebron Maternity and Children's Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Gloria Pelizzo
    Pediatric Surgery Unit, Children's Hospital G. Di Cristina, ARNAS Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy.
  • Henri Steyaert
    Division of Pediatric Surgery, Huderf Children's Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Piergiorgio Gamba
    Pediatric Surgery Unit, Medical University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Maria Grazia Scuderi
    Division of Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  • Maria Escolino
    Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Medical Science, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy.
  • Marco Castagnetti
    Pediatric Urology Unit, Medical University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Fabio Chiarenza
    Division of Pediatric Surgery, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
  • Alaa El Ghoneimi
    Division of Pediatric Surgery, CHU Robert Debré, Paris, France.