Comparison of the data mining and machine learning algorithms for predicting the final body weight for Romane sheep breed.

Journal: PloS one
PMID:

Abstract

The current study aimed to predict final body weight (weight of fourth months of age to select the future reproducers) by using birth weight, birth type, sex, suckling weight, age at suckling weight, weaning weight, age at weaning weight, and age of final body weight for the Romane sheep breed. For this purpose, classification and regression tree (CART), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and support vector machine regression (SVR) algorithms were used for training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. Different data mining and machine learning algorithms were used to predict final body weight of 393 Romane sheep (238 female and 155 male animals) were used with different artificial intelligence algorithms. The best prediction model was obtained by CART model, both training and testing set. Constructed CART models indicated that sex, suckling weight, weaning weight, age of weaning weight, and age of final weight could be used as an indirect selection measure to get a superior sheep flock on the final body weight of Romane sheep. If genetically established, the Romane sheep whose sex is female, age of final weight is over 142 days, and weaning weight is over 28 kg could be chosen for affording genetic improvement in final body weight. In conclusion, the usage of CART procedure may be worthy of reflection for identifying breed standards and choosing superior sheep for meat yield in France.

Authors

  • Cem Tırınk
    Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Igdir University, Iğdır, Türkiye.
  • Hasan Önder
    Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Türkiye.
  • Dominique Francois
    GenPhySE, INRA, INPT, INP-ENVT, Université de Toulouse, Castanet Tolosan, France.
  • Didier Marcon
    INRAE, UE P3R, Osmoy, France.
  • Uğur Şen
    Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Türkiye.
  • Kymbat Shaikenova
    Department of Technology and Processing of Livestock Production, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Technology, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
  • Karlygash Omarova
    Department of Technology and Processing of Livestock Production, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Technology, Saken Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
  • Thobela Louis Tyasi
    Department of Agricultural Economics and Animal Production, School of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, Limpopo, South Africa.