Propensity score-matched analysis of the short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Journal: Asian journal of endoscopic surgery

Published Date: Jul 1, 2023

Abstract

PURPOSE: The advantages of robot-assisted rectal surgery (RARS) over conventional laparoscope-assisted rectal surgery (LARS) remain controversial. This study was performed to compare the short-term outcomes of RARS and LARS.

Authors

Masayoshi Obatake

Division of Digestive Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Masanori Hotchi

Division of Digestive Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Naho Ishimura

Division of Digestive Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Masayuki Kanzaki

Division of Digestive Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Masato Yoshikawa

Division of Digestive Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Kazunori Tokuda

Division of Digestive Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Miya Watanabe

Division of Digestive Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Hiroshi Kotegawa

Division of Digestive Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Hirotsugu Yoshiyama

Division of Digestive Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Hiromi Ohtani

Division of Digestive Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Masamitsu Harada

Independent Scholar, Tokyo, Japan.

Keywords

Humans Laparoscopy Postoperative Complications Propensity Score Rectal Neoplasms Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotics Treatment Outcome

External Resources

View on PubMed Access via DOI PubMed (37076427)

Propensity score-matched analysis of the short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Abstract

Authors

Keywords

External Resources

Popular Topics

Recent Journals