Robotic Surgery in Urology: History from PROBOT to HUGO.

Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
Published Date:

Abstract

The advent of robotic surgical systems had a significant impact on every surgical area, especially urology, gynecology, and general and cardiac surgery. The aim of this article is to delineate robotic surgery, particularly focusing on its historical background, its evolution, its present status, and its future perspectives. A comprehensive literature review was conducted upon PubMed/MEDLINE, using the keywords "robotic surgical system", "robotic surgical device", "robotics AND urology". Additionally, the retrieved articles' reference lists were investigated. Analysis concentrated on urological surgical systems for laparoscopic surgery that have been given regulatory approval for use on humans. From the late 1980s, before Era in 2000s, ancestor platform as Probot and PUMA 560 were described to outline historical perspective. Thus, new robotic competitors of Intuitive Surgical such as , , , , , and were illustrated. Although had high level competitiveness, and for many years represented the most plausible option for robotic procedures, several modern platforms are emerging in the surgical market. Growing competition through unique features of the new robotic technologies might extend applications fields, improve diffusion, and increase cost-effectiveness procedures. More experiences are needed to identify the role of these new advancements in surgical branches and in healthcare systems.

Authors

  • Aldo Brassetti
    Fondazione Vincenzo Pansadoro, Centro di Urologia Laparoscopica e Oncologia Medica, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: aldo.brassetti@gmail.com.
  • Alberto Ragusa
    Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
  • Francesco Tedesco
    Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
  • Francesco Prata
    Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
  • Loris Cacciatore
    Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
  • Andrea Iannuzzi
    Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
  • Alfredo Maria Bove
    Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Umberto Anceschi
    Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: umberto.anceschi@gmail.com.
  • Flavia Proietti
    Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
  • Simone D'annunzio
    Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy.
  • Rocco Simone Flammia
    Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
  • Giuseppe Chiacchio
    Urology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, School of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Delle Marche, 60127 Ancona, Italy.
  • Mariaconsiglia Ferriero
    Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Salvatore Guaglianone
    Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Riccardo Mastroianni
    Complex Operative Unit of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Leonardo Misuraca
    Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Gabriele Tuderti
    Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Giuseppe Simone
    Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.