Deep learning-based reconstruction can improve canine thoracolumbar magnetic resonance image quality and reduce slice thickness.

Journal: Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association
Published Date:

Abstract

In veterinary practice, thin-sliced thoracolumbar MRI is useful in detecting small lesions, especially in small-breed dogs. However, it is challenging due to the partial volume averaging effect and increase in scan time. Currently, deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR), a part of artificial intelligence, has been applied in diagnostic imaging. We hypothesized that the diagnostic performance of thin-slice thoracolumbar MRI with DLR would be superior to conventional MRI. This prospective, method comparison study aimed to determine the adequate slice thickness of a deep learning model for thin-slice thoracolumbar MRI. Sagittal and transverse T2-weighted MRI at the thoracolumbar region were performed on 12 clinically healthy beagle dogs; the images obtained were categorized into five groups according to slice thickness: conventional thickness of 3 mm ( CON) and thicknesses of 3, 2, 1.5, and 1 mm with DLR ( DLR, DLR, DLR, and DLR, respectively). Quantitative analysis was performed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio. Qualitative analysis involved the evaluation of perceived SNR, structural visibility, and overall image quality using a four-point scale. Moreover, nerve root visibility was evaluated using transverse images. Quantitative and qualitative values were compared among the five groups. Compared with the CON group, the DLR, DLR, and DLR groups exhibited significantly higher quantitative and qualitative values. Nerve root visibility was significantly higher in DLR, DLR, and DLR images than in DLR and CON images. Compared with conventional MRI, DLR reduced the slice thickness by up to one-half and improved image quality in this sample of clinically healthy beagles.

Authors

  • Hyesun Kang
    College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Daji Noh
    College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Sang-Kwon Lee
    College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Sooyoung Choi
    College of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Kija Lee
    College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.