Individual characteristics outperform resting-state fMRI for the prediction of behavioral phenotypes.

Journal: Communications biology
PMID:

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to compare imaging-based features of brain function, measured by resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI), with individual characteristics such as age, gender, and total intracranial volume to predict behavioral measures. We developed a machine learning framework based on rsfMRI features in a dataset of 20,000 healthy individuals from the UK Biobank, focusing on temporal complexity and functional connectivity measures. Our analysis across four behavioral phenotypes revealed that both temporal complexity and functional connectivity measures provide comparable predictive performance. However, individual characteristics consistently outperformed rsfMRI features in predictive accuracy, particularly in analyses involving smaller sample sizes. Integrating rsfMRI features with demographic data sometimes enhanced predictive outcomes. The efficacy of different predictive modeling techniques and the choice of brain parcellation atlas were also examined, showing no significant influence on the results. To summarize, while individual characteristics are superior to rsfMRI in predicting behavioral phenotypes, rsfMRI still conveys additional predictive value in the context of machine learning, such as investigating the role of specific brain regions in behavioral phenotypes.

Authors

  • Amir Omidvarnia
    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
  • Leonard Sasse
    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
  • Daouia I Larabi
    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
  • Federico Raimondo
    Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Exact & Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Felix Hoffstaedter
    7Institute for Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany.
  • Jan Kasper
    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behavior (INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, Jülich, 52428, Germany.
  • Jürgen Dukart
    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behavior (INM-7), Research Center Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, Jülich, 52428, Germany.
  • Marvin Petersen
    Clinic and Polyclinic for Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Bastian Cheng
    Clinic and Polyclinic for Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Götz Thomalla
    Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Simon B Eickhoff
    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1, INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
  • Kaustubh R Patil
    Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.