AI-based IsAb2.0 for antibody design.

Journal: Briefings in bioinformatics
PMID:

Abstract

Therapeutic antibody design has garnered widespread attention, highlighting its interdisciplinary importance. Advancements in technology emphasize the critical role of designing nanobodies and humanized antibodies in antibody engineering. However, current experimental methods are costly and time-consuming. Computational approaches, while progressing, faced limitations due to insufficient structural data and the absence of a standardized protocol. To tackle these challenges, our lab previously developed IsAb1.0, an in silico antibody design protocol. Yet, IsAb1.0 lacked accuracy, had a complex procedure, and required extensive antibody bioinformation. Moreover, it overlooked nanobody and humanized antibody design, hindering therapeutic antibody development. Building upon IsAb1.0, we enhanced our design protocol with artificial intelligence methods to create IsAb2.0. IsAb2.0 utilized AlphaFold-Multimer (2.3/3.0) for accurate modeling and complex construction without templates and employed the precise FlexddG method for in silico antibody optimization. Validated through optimization of a humanized nanobody J3 (HuJ3) targeting HIV-1 gp120, IsAb2.0 predicted five mutations that can improve HuJ3-gp120 binding affinity. These predictions were confirmed by commercial software and validated through binding and neutralization assays. IsAb2.0 streamlined antibody design, offering insights into future techniques to accelerate immunotherapy development.

Authors

  • Tianjian Liang
    Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy; National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research; Drug Discovery Institute; and Departments of Computational Biology and Structural Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, United States.
  • Ze-Yu Sun
    Algorithm Center, Keya Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China.
  • Margaret G Hines
    Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Center for Antibody Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • Kerri Jo Penrose
    Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Center for AIDS Research, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • Yixuan Hao
    Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, Pharmacometrics & System Pharmacology PharmacoAnalytics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 335 Sutherland Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
  • Xiaojie Chu
    Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Center for Antibody Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • John W Mellors
    Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Center for Antibody Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • Dimiter S Dimitrov
    Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Center for Antibody Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • Xiang-Qun Xie
  • Wei Li
    Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
  • Zhiwei Feng
    Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; NIDA National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Drug Discovery Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.