Insertable Glucose Sensor Using a Compact and Cost-Effective Phosphorescence Lifetime Imager and Machine Learning.

Journal: ACS nano
PMID:

Abstract

Optical continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are emerging for personalized glucose management owing to their lower cost and prolonged durability compared to conventional electrochemical CGMs. Here, we report a computational CGM system, which integrates a biocompatible phosphorescence-based insertable biosensor and a custom-designed phosphorescence lifetime imager (PLI). This compact and cost-effective PLI is designed to capture phosphorescence lifetime images of an insertable sensor through the skin, where the lifetime of the emitted phosphorescence signal is modulated by the local concentration of glucose. Because this phosphorescence signal has a very long lifetime compared to tissue autofluorescence or excitation leakage processes, it completely bypasses these noise sources by measuring the sensor emission over several tens of microseconds after the excitation light is turned off. The lifetime images acquired through the skin are processed by neural network-based models for misalignment-tolerant inference of glucose levels, accurately revealing normal, low (hypoglycemia) and high (hyperglycemia) concentration ranges. Using a 1 mm thick skin phantom mimicking the optical properties of human skin, we performed in vitro testing of the PLI using glucose-spiked samples, yielding 88.8% inference accuracy, also showing resilience to random and unknown misalignments within a lateral distance of ∼4.7 mm with respect to the position of the insertable sensor underneath the skin phantom. Furthermore, the PLI accurately identified larger lateral misalignments beyond 5 mm, prompting user intervention for realignment. The misalignment-resilient glucose concentration inference capability of this compact and cost-effective PLI makes it an appealing wearable diagnostics tool for real-time tracking of glucose and other biomarkers.

Authors

  • Artem Goncharov
    Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
  • Zoltán Göröcs
    Electrical Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  • Ridhi Pradhan
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
  • Brian Ko
    Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and Monash Heart, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ajmal Ajmal
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199, United States.
  • Andrés Rodríguez
    Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • David Baum
  • Marcell Veszpremi
    Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Xilin Yang
  • Maxime Pindrys
    Department of Physics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, United States.
  • Tianle Zheng
    Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
  • Oliver Wang
    HBI Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
  • Jessica C Ramella-Roman
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199, United States.
  • Michael J McShane
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
  • Aydogan Ozcan
    Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.