A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Journal: International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics

Published Date: Dec 9, 2015

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RALSC) has spread rapidly without the availability of comprehensive and systematically recorded outcome data.

Authors

Ke Pan

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yao Zhang

Department of Nephrology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Yanzhou Wang

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yunle Wang

School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Huicheng Xu

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. Electronic address: huichengxu123@163.com.

Keywords

Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Laparoscopy Length of Stay Operative Time Patient Satisfaction Pelvic Organ Prolapse Postoperative Complications Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Robotic Surgical Procedures Surgical Mesh Treatment Outcome Vagina

External Resources

View on PubMed Access via DOI PubMed (26797199)

A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Abstract

Authors

Keywords

External Resources

Popular Topics

Recent Journals