Robot-assisted percutaneous placement of K-wires during minimally invasive interventions of the spine.

Journal: Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy
Published Date:

Abstract

To assess the accuracy and time requirements of image-guided percutaneous K-wire insertion in the spine using an advanced robot assistance device for needle guidance and to demonstrate a radiation-free workflow for the physician. A planning CT-scan was acquired of a cadaver specimen and analyzed using a 3D-interventional software integrated in the robotic device. The optimal needle path was simulated and the needle holder of the robot was used for guidance during K-wire insertion. Twenty-four K-wires were inserted percutaneously in a transpedicular approach in the following vertebrae: thoracic (T) 2, 7-12 and lumbar (L) 1-5. A post-procedural CT scan was performed to analyze the accuracy of the K-wire insertion. All procedures were carried out without any perforation of the pedicle wall. The mean duration of planning the intervention path was 2:54 ± 2:22 min, mean positioning time was 2:04 ± 0:42 min and the mean time for K-wire insertion was 2:13 ± 0:54 min. In total, the average intervention time was 7:10 ± 3:06 min per pedicle. Compared to the planning, the K-wire position showed a mean deviation of 0.5 mm in the vertical-axis and 1.2 mm in the horizontal-axis. The average intervention path length was 8.1 cm. Our findings show a high accuracy in robot-assisted K-wire insertion during spinal interventions without any exposure of the operator to radiation.

Authors

  • Yann Croissant
    Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Stephan Zangos
    Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Moritz H Albrecht
    Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Katrin Eichler
  • Christof Schomerus
    Fachbereich Medizin der Goethe-Universität, Dr Senckenbergische Anatomie, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Adam Spandorfer
    Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston SC, United States.
  • U Joseph Schoepf
    Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.).
  • Thomas J Vogl
    Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Christoph Czerny
    Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.