Exposure to polydopamine nanoparticles induces neurotoxicity in the developing zebrafish.

Journal: NanoImpact
PMID:

Abstract

Currently, the potential applications of polydopamine (PDA) nanoparticles in the biomedical field are being extensively studied, such as cell internalization, biocompatible surface modification, biological imaging, nano-drug delivery, cancer diagnosis, and treatment. However, the subsequent toxicological response to PDA nanoparticles, especially on nervous system damage was still largely unknown. In this regard, the evaluation of the neurotoxicity of PDA nanoparticles was performed in the developing zebrafish larvae. Results of the transmission electron microscope (TEM), diameter analysis, H NMR, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated that PDA nanoparticles had high stability without any depolymerization; the maximum non-lethal dose (MNLD) and LD of PDA nanoparticles for zebrafish were determined to be 0.5 mg/mL and 4 mg/mL. Pericardial edema and uninflated swim bladders were observed in zebrafish larvae after exposure to PDA nanoparticles. At a concentration higher than MNLD, the fluorescence images manifested that the PDA nanoparticles could inhibit the axonal growth of peripheral motor neurons in zebrafish, which might affect the movement distances and speed, disturb the movement trace, finally resulting in impaired motor function. However, in further investigating the mechanism of PDA nanoparticles-induced neurotoxicity in zebrafish larvae, we did not find apoptosis of central neurocytes. Our data suggested that PDA nanoparticles might trigger neurotoxicity in zebrafish, which could provide an essential clue for the safety assessment of PDA nanoparticles.

Authors

  • Mengqi Sun
    Department of Toxicology and Sanitary Chemistry, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China.
  • Yuanyuan Cao
    Department of Toxicology and Sanitary Chemistry, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China.
  • Qinglin Sun
    Department of Toxicology and Sanitary Chemistry, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China.
  • Xiaoke Ren
    Department of Toxicology and Sanitary Chemistry, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China.
  • Junjie Hu
    Department of Toxicology and Sanitary Chemistry, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China.
  • Zhiwei Sun
    Department of Toxicology and Hygienic Chemistry, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China.
  • Junchao Duan
    Department of Toxicology and Sanitary Chemistry, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, PR China. Electronic address: jcduan@ccmu.edu.cn.