Omitting Cortical Renorrhaphy in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Is it Safe? A Single Center Large Case Series.
Journal:
Journal of endourology
Published Date:
Aug 1, 2020
Abstract
Preserving renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is important and influenced by the technique of renal reconstruction among other parameters, including ischemia time and amount of healthy renal tissue resected. It is believed that reconstruction with a second layer of cortical renorrhaphy is necessary to prevent urinary leaks and postoperative bleeding, but this is associated with the potential loss of healthy renal parenchyma and may result in worse outcomes postoperatively. To assess the safety of omitting cortical renorrhaphy during RAPN. A retrospective analysis of 146 consecutive patients undergoing a RAPN with single or double layer renorrhaphy at the Wirral University Teaching Hospital from 2014 to 2019. Data obtained included: Patient demographics, tumor RENAL nephrometry, Perioperative parameters; blood loss, duration, and warm ischemia time (WIT), Postop complications, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (pre and 3 months postop), length of stay, and oncologic outcomes. In total 146 patients were identified. One hundred-six had double renorrhaphy and 40 inner layer only renorrhaphy. No significant differences were seen between these two cohorts in terms of patient demographics, RENAL nephrometry score, tumor size, or location. Perioperative parameters showed a reduced duration of surgery in the single renorrhaphy group with a mean of 125 minutes compared to143 minutes in the double renorrhaphy ( = 0.006) and a tendency toward a shorter WIT of 12.9 minutes 14.0 minutes reaching borderline statistical significance ( = 0.05) but no difference in blood loss volume ( = 0.25). Postoperatively there was no statistical difference in the length of hospital stay ( = 0.85), loss in eGFR at 3 months (0.06), or complication ( = 0.56). After a median follow-up of 35 months no recurrences or deaths were observed in either group. Omission of cortical renorrhaphy appears feasible and safe with no urine leaks or excess complications observed.