A computational framework for optimal control of a self-adjustive neural system with activity-dependent and homeostatic plasticity.

Journal: NeuroImage
Published Date:

Abstract

The control of the brain system has received increasing attention in the domain of brain science. Most brain control studies have been conducted to explore the brain network's graph-theoretic properties or to produce the desired state based on neural state dynamics, regarding the brain as a passively responding system. However, the self-adjusting nature of neural system after treatment has not been fully considered in the brain control. In the present study, we propose a computational framework for optimal control of the brain with a self-adjustment process in the effective connectivity after treatment. The neural system is modeled to adjust its outgoing effective connectivity as activity-dependent plasticity after treatment, followed by synaptic rescaling of incoming effective connectivity. To control this neural system to induce the desired function, the system's self-adjustment parameter is first estimated, based on which the treatment is optimized. Utilizing this framework, we conducted simulations of optimal control over a functional hippocampal circuitry, estimated using dynamic causal modeling of voltage-sensitive dye imaging from the wild type and mutant mice, responding to consecutive electrical stimuli. Simulation results for optimal control of the abnormal circuit toward a healthy circuit using a single node treatment, neural-type specific treatment as an analogy of medication, and combined treatments of medication and nodal treatment suggest the plausibility of the current framework in controlling the self-adjusting neural system within a restricted treatment setting. We believe the proposed computational framework of the self-adjustment system would help optimal control of the dynamic brain after treatment.

Authors

  • Jiyoung Kang
    Center for Systems and Translational Brain Science, Institute of Human Complexity and Systems Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Graduate School of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 Project, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jinseok Eo
    Center for Systems and Translational Brain Science, Institute of Human Complexity and Systems Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Graduate School of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 Project, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Dong Myeong Lee
    Center for Systems and Translational Brain Science, Institute of Human Complexity and Systems Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Graduate School of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 Project, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Hae-Jeong Park
    BK21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Department of Psychiatry, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: parkhj@yonsei.ac.kr.