Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal: European urology focus

PMID: 34429272

Abstract

CONTEXT: Retzius sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) is increasingly being used, but results of pertinent studies on perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes comparing the Retzius sparing approach with standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) remain inconsistent.

Authors

Bara Barakat

Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Hospital Viersen, Viersen, Germany. Electronic address: dr.barakat3@googlemail.com.
Hazem Othman

Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Hospital Viersen, Viersen, Germany.
Ulrich Gauger

Institute for Medical Statistics, Berlin, Germany.
Ingmar Wolff

Department of Urology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Boris Hadaschik

Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Christian Rehme

Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Keywords

Erectile Dysfunction Humans Male Margins of Excision Observational Studies as Topic Prostatectomy Prostatic Neoplasms Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotics Treatment Outcome

External Resources

View on PubMed Access via DOI PubMed (34429272)

Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Abstract

Authors

Keywords

External Resources

Popular Topics

Recent Journals