Assessment of the quality of different commercial providers using artificial intelligence for automated cephalometric analysis compared to human orthodontic experts.

Journal: Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie

PMID: 37642657

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the accuracy of various skeletal and dental cephalometric parameters as produced by different commercial providers that make use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted automated cephalometric analysis and to compare their quality to a gold standard established by orthodontic experts.

Authors

Felix Kunz

Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. kunz_f@ukw.de.
Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer

Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Lisa Marie Widmaier

Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Florian Zeman

Centre for Clinical Studies, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Julian Boldt

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Keywords

Anatomic Landmarks Artificial Intelligence Cephalometry Humans Observer Variation Orthodontics Quality Assurance, Health Care Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity

External Resources

View on PubMed Access via DOI PubMed (37642657)

Assessment of the quality of different commercial providers using artificial intelligence for automated cephalometric analysis compared to human orthodontic experts.

Abstract

Authors

Keywords

External Resources

Popular Topics

Recent Journals