Robot-Assisted Repair of Ureteroenteric Strictures After Cystectomy with Urinary Diversion: Technique Description and Outcomes from the European Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.

Journal: Journal of endourology
PMID:

Abstract

Robot-assisted repair of benign ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures (UAS) provides an alternative to the open approach. We aimed to report short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes for robotic repair of benign UAS, and to provide a detailed video demonstration of critical operative techniques in performing this procedure robotically. Between January 2013 and September 2022, 31 patients from seven institutions who previously underwent radical cystectomy and subsequently developed UAS underwent robotic repair of UAS. Perioperative variables were prospectively collected, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. The surgery starts with a lysis of adhesions after previous surgery. Ureters are dissected, and the level of the stricture is identified. The ureter is then divided, and the stricture is resected. Finally, the ureter is spatulated and reimplanted with Nesbit technique after stenting with Double-J stents. In cases where both ureters show strictures, Wallace technique for reimplantation can be applied. After robotic or open cystectomy, 31 patients had a total of 43 UAS at a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 21 (9-43) months. Median stricture length was 2.0 (1.0-3.25) cm, operative duration was 141 (121-232) minutes, estimated blood loss was 100 (50-150) mL, and length of hospital stay was 5 (3-9) days. One (3.2%) case was converted to open and one (3.2%) intraoperative complication occurred. Seven (22.6%) patients experienced postoperative complications, including four (12.9%) Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications. No Clavien-Dindo grade 4 or 5 complications occurred. Stricture recurrence occurred in 2 (6.5%) patients. These results demonstrate that robotic repair of UAS is feasible and effective approach with outcomes in line with prior open series. Authors have received and archived patient consent for video recording and publication in advance of video recording of procedure.

Authors

  • Jordan M Rich
    Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Neeraja Tillu
    Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Ralph Grauer
    Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Dallin Busby
    Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
  • Rebecca Auer
    Department of Urology, Winterthur Kantonsspital, Winterthur, Switzerland.
  • Alberto Breda
    Department of Urology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: albbred@hotmail.com.
  • Stephan Buse
    Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany.
  • Frederiek D'Hondt
    General Surgery and Urology. OLV Hospital. Belgium.
  • Ugo Falagario
    Division of Urology, VCU Health System, Richmond, VA, USA; Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
  • Abolfazl Hosseini
  • Reza Mehrazin
    Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Andrea Minervini
    Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Alexandre Mottrie
    ORSI Academy Melle Belgium.
  • John Sfakianos
    Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
  • Joan Palou
    Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Carl Wijburg
    Department of Urology, Robotic Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
  • Peter Wiklund
    Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Hubert John
    Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland.