AIMC Topic: Authorship

Clear Filters Showing 21 to 30 of 69 articles

A model-independent redundancy measure for human versus ChatGPT authorship discrimination using a Bayesian probabilistic approach.

Scientific reports
The academic and scientific world in general is increasingly concerned about their inability to determine and ascertain the identity of the writer of a text. More and more often the question arises as to whether a scientific article or work handed in...

Algorithmic bias and research integrity; the role of nonhuman authors in shaping scientific knowledge with respect to artificial intelligence: a perspective.

International journal of surgery (London, England)
Artificial intelligence technologies were developed to assist authors in bettering the organization and caliber of their published papers, which are both growing in quantity and sophistication. Even though the usage of artificial intelligence tools i...

Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor.

Journal of medical Internet research
The ethics of generative artificial intelligence (AI) use in scientific manuscript content creation has become a serious matter of concern in the scientific publishing community. Generative AI has computationally become capable of elaborating researc...

Cracking double-blind review: Authorship attribution with deep learning.

PloS one
Double-blind peer review is considered a pillar of academic research because it is perceived to ensure a fair, unbiased, and fact-centered scientific discussion. Yet, experienced researchers can often correctly guess from which research group an anon...