Clinical advantages in providing artificial intelligence-assisted prostate cancer diagnosis: A pilot study.

Journal: Pathology, research and practice
Published Date:

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a prevalent male malignancy, with increasing incidence rates placing significant diagnostic burdens on pathology services worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a promising aid in enhancing diagnostic efficiency and accuracy. This study evaluates the clinical benefits of AI-assisted prostate biopsy (PB) diagnosis, with Paige Prostate tool, compared to non-AI-assisted PB diagnosis, focusing on its predictive accuracy for features in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. A retrospective analysis included 55 patients divided into two cohorts: one with non-AI-assisted PB diagnosis (n = 25) and another with AI-assisted PB diagnosis (n = 30). Pathological assessments recorded tumor size, Gleason score, Grade Group, and perineural invasion. The correlation between PB and RP results was analyzed, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. AI-assisted PB diagnosis showed faster reporting times by 24 hours, enhancing workflow efficiency. AI assistance improved the correlation of tumor size between PB and RP, showing a substantial agreement (R=0.646, p < 0.001) compared to non-AI (R=0.479, p = 0.015). Gleason Score concordance increased by 13 % in the AI-assisted group, achieving 73.3 % versus 60 % in the non-AI-assisted group. This small pilot study suggests that AI-assisted PB diagnosis appears to enhance efficiency and accuracy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, a finding to be confirmed with further studies.

Authors

  • C Eloy
    Pathology Department, Medical Faculty of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Pathology Laboratory, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: celoy@ipatimup.pt.
  • A Asaturova
    1st pathology department FSBI & National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I.Kulakov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  • J Pinto
    Pathology Laboratory, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.
  • I Rienda
    Pathology Laboratory, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.
  • A Syrnioti
    Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • R Prisco
    Urology Department, Hospital CUF Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • A Polónia
    Pathology Laboratory, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal; Escola de Medicina e Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal.