Thin-Slice Pituitary MRI with Deep Learning-based Reconstruction: Diagnostic Performance in a Postoperative Setting.

Journal: Radiology
PMID:

Abstract

Background Achieving high-spatial-resolution pituitary MRI is challenging because of the trade-off between image noise and spatial resolution. Deep learning-based MRI reconstruction enables image denoising with sharp edges and reduced artifacts, which improves the image quality of thin-slice MRI. Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of 1-mm slice thickness MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) (hereafter, 1-mm MRI+DLR) compared with 3-mm slice thickness MRI (hereafter, 3-mm MRI) for identifying residual tumor and cavernous sinus invasion in the evaluation of postoperative pituitary adenoma. Materials and Methods This single-institution retrospective study included 65 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 54 years ± 10; 26 women) who underwent a combined imaging protocol including 3-mm MRI and 1-mm MRI+DLR for postoperative evaluation of pituitary adenoma between August and October 2019. Reference standards for correct diagnosis were established by using all available imaging resources, clinical histories, laboratory findings, surgical records, and pathology reports. The diagnostic performances of 3-mm MRI, 1-mm slice thickness MRI without DLR (hereafter, 1-mm MRI), and 1-mm MRI+DLR for identifying residual tumor and cavernous sinus invasion were evaluated by two readers and compared between the protocols. Results The performance of 1-mm MRI+DLR in the identification of residual tumor was comparable to that of 3-mm MRI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.89-0.92 vs 0.85-0.89, respectively; ≥ .09). In the identification of cavernous sinus invasion, the diagnostic performance of 1-mm MRI+DLR was higher than that of 3-mm MRI (AUC, 0.95-0.98 vs 0.83-0.87, respectively; ≤ .02). Conventional 1-mm MRI (AUC, 0.82-0.83) showed comparable diagnostic performance to 3-mm MRI (AUC, 0.83-0.87) ( ≥ .38). With 1-mm MRI+DLR, residual tumor was diagnosed in 20 patients and cavernous sinus invasion was diagnosed in 14 patients, in whom these diagnoses were not made with 3-mm MRI. Conclusion In the postoperative evaluation of pituitary adenoma, 1-mm slice thickness MRI with deep learning-based reconstruction showed higher diagnostic performance than 3-mm slice thickness MRI in the identification of cavernous sinus invasion and comparable diagnostic performance to 3-mm slice thickness MRI in the identification of residual tumor. © RSNA, 2020

Authors

  • Minjae Kim
    From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (M.K., H.S.K., H.J.K., J.E.P., S.J.K.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), and Department of Neurosurgery (Y.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea; GE Healthcare Korea, Seoul, Korea (J.L.); GE Healthcare Canada, Calgary, Canada (M.R.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (M.R.L.).
  • Ho Sung Kim
    Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Hyun Jin Kim
    From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (M.K., H.S.K., H.J.K., J.E.P., S.J.K.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), and Department of Neurosurgery (Y.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea; GE Healthcare Korea, Seoul, Korea (J.L.); GE Healthcare Canada, Calgary, Canada (M.R.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (M.R.L.).
  • Ji Eun Park
    Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan 602-714, Korea.
  • Seo Young Park
    Statistics and Data Science, Korea National Open University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Young-Hoon Kim
    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Sang Joon Kim
    Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Joonsung Lee
    From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (M.K., H.S.K., H.J.K., J.E.P., S.J.K.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), and Department of Neurosurgery (Y.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea; GE Healthcare Korea, Seoul, Korea (J.L.); GE Healthcare Canada, Calgary, Canada (M.R.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (M.R.L.).
  • Marc R Lebel
    From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (M.K., H.S.K., H.J.K., J.E.P., S.J.K.), Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.Y.P.), and Department of Neurosurgery (Y.H.K.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea; GE Healthcare Korea, Seoul, Korea (J.L.); GE Healthcare Canada, Calgary, Canada (M.R.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (M.R.L.).