Advances in for Abiotic Stress Resilience: From 'Omics' to Artificial Intelligence.

Journal: International journal of molecular sciences
PMID:

Abstract

Legumes are a better source of proteins and are richer in diverse micronutrients over the nutritional profile of widely consumed cereals. However, when exposed to a diverse range of abiotic stresses, their overall productivity and quality are hugely impacted. Our limited understanding of genetic determinants and novel variants associated with the abiotic stress response in food legume crops restricts its amelioration. Therefore, it is imperative to understand different molecular approaches in food legume crops that can be utilized in crop improvement programs to minimize the economic loss. 'Omics'-based molecular breeding provides better opportunities over conventional breeding for diversifying the natural germplasm together with improving yield and quality parameters. Due to molecular advancements, the technique is now equipped with novel 'omics' approaches such as ionomics, epigenomics, fluxomics, RNomics, glycomics, glycoproteomics, phosphoproteomics, lipidomics, regulomics, and secretomics. Pan-omics-which utilizes the molecular bases of the stress response to identify genes (genomics), mRNAs (transcriptomics), proteins (proteomics), and biomolecules (metabolomics) associated with stress regulation-has been widely used for abiotic stress amelioration in food legume crops. Integration of pan-omics with novel omics approaches will fast-track legume breeding programs. Moreover, artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms can be utilized for simulating crop yield under changing environments, which can help in predicting the genetic gain beforehand. Application of machine learning (ML) in quantitative trait loci (QTL) mining will further help in determining the genetic determinants of abiotic stress tolerance in pulses.

Authors

  • Dharmendra Singh
    Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
  • Priya Chaudhary
    Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
  • Jyoti Taunk
    Division of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
  • Chandan Kumar Singh
    Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
  • Deepti Singh
    Department of Botany, Meerut College, Meerut 250001, India.
  • Ram Sewak Singh Tomar
    College of Horticulture and Forestry, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi 284003, India.
  • Muraleedhar Aski
    Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
  • Noren Singh Konjengbam
    College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University, Imphal 793103, India.
  • Ranjeet Sharan Raje
    Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
  • Sanjay Singh
    ICAR- National Institute of Plant Biotechnology, LBS Centre, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India.
  • Rakesh Singh Sengar
    College of Biotechnology, Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel Agricultural University, Meerut 250001, India.
  • Rajendra Kumar Yadav
    Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur 208002, India.
  • Madan Pal
    Division of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.