Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.

Journal: World journal of surgery

PMID: 35499646

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this matched-cohort study, we investigated the short-term outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared with conventional minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy (MIE) in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors

Takeo Fujita

Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan. takfujit@east.ncc.go.jp.
Kazuma Sato

Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Asako Ozaki

Osaka Institute of Public Health.
Tomohiro Akutsu

Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Hisashi Fujiwara

Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Takashi Kojima

Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, tkojkoj@mac.com.
Hiroyuki Daiko

Division of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Keywords

Cohort Studies Esophageal Neoplasms Esophagectomy Humans Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Paralysis Postoperative Complications Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies Robotics Thoracic Neoplasms Treatment Outcome

External Resources

View on PubMed Access via DOI PubMed (35499646)

Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.

Abstract

Authors

Keywords

External Resources

Popular Topics

Recent Journals