AI Medical Compendium Journal:
The Behavioral and brain sciences

Showing 41 to 50 of 76 articles

The second-order problem of other minds.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
The target article proposes that people perceive social robots as depictions rather than as genuine social agents. We suggest that people might instead view social robots as social agents, albeit agents with more restricted capacities and moral right...

Social robots as social learning partners: Exploring children's early understanding and learning from social robots.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Clark and Fischer propose that people interpret social robots not as social agents, but as interactive depictions. Drawing on research focusing on how children selectively learn from social others, we argue that children do not view social robots as ...

A more ecological perspective on human-robot interactions.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Drawing from two strands of ecological psychology, we suggest that even if social robots are interactive depictions, people need not mentally represent them as such. Rather, people can engage with the opportunities for action or affordances that soci...

Virtual real: Symbolic and natural experiences with social robots.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Interactions with social robots are guided by the pretense that robots depict real people. But they can also be that are direct, automatic, and independent of any thoughtful mapping between what is real and depicted. Both experiences are important,...

Autonomous social robots are real in the mind's eye of many.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Clark and Fischer's dismissal of extant human-robot interaction research approaches limits opportunities to understand major variables shaping people's engagement with social robots. Instead, this endeavour categorically requires multidisciplinary ap...

Dancing robots: Social interactions are performed, not depicted.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Clark and Fischer's depiction hypothesis is based on examples of western mimetic art. Yet social robots do not depict social interactions, but instead perform them. Similarly, dance and performance art do not rely on depiction. Kinematics and express...

How cultural framing can bias our beliefs about robots and artificial intelligence.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Clark and Fischer argue that humans treat social artifacts as depictions. In contrast, theories of distributed cognition suggest that there is no clear line separating artifacts from agents, and artifacts can possess agency. The difference is likely ...

Meta-cognition about social robots could be difficult, making self-reports about some cognitive processes less useful.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
There are reasons to suspect that meta-cognition about construing social robots as depictions would be more difficult - or absent - than Clark and Fischer discuss. Self-reports about the cognitive processes involved might therefore tend to be incompl...

Anthropomorphism, not depiction, explains interaction with social robots.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
We question the role given to depiction in Clark and Fischer's account of interaction with social robots. Specifically, we argue that positing a unique cognitive process for handling depiction is evolutionarily implausible and empirically redundant b...

Unpredictable robots elicit responsibility attributions.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Do people hold robots responsible for their actions? While Clark and Fischer present a useful framework for interpreting social robots, we argue that they fail to account for people's willingness to assign responsibility to robots in certain contexts...