Robot-assisted procedures in pediatric neurosurgery.

Journal: Neurosurgical focus
PMID:

Abstract

OBJECTIVE During the last 3 decades, robotic technology has rapidly spread across several surgical fields due to the continuous evolution of its versatility, stability, dexterity, and haptic properties. Neurosurgery pioneered the development of robotics, with the aim of improving the quality of several procedures requiring a high degree of accuracy and safety. Moreover, robot-guided approaches are of special interest in pediatric patients, who often have altered anatomy and challenging relationships between the diseased and eloquent structures. Nevertheless, the use of robots has been rarely reported in children. In this work, the authors describe their experience using the ROSA device (Robotized Stereotactic Assistant) in the neurosurgical management of a pediatric population. METHODS Between 2011 and 2016, 116 children underwent ROSA-assisted procedures for a variety of diseases (epilepsy, brain tumors, intra- or extraventricular and tumor cysts, obstructive hydrocephalus, and movement and behavioral disorders). Each patient received accurate preoperative planning of optimal trajectories, intraoperative frameless registration, surgical treatment using specific instruments held by the robotic arm, and postoperative CT or MR imaging. RESULTS The authors performed 128 consecutive surgeries, including implantation of 386 electrodes for stereo-electroencephalography (36 procedures), neuroendoscopy (42 procedures), stereotactic biopsy (26 procedures), pallidotomy (12 procedures), shunt placement (6 procedures), deep brain stimulation procedures (3 procedures), and stereotactic cyst aspiration (3 procedures). For each procedure, the authors analyzed and discussed accuracy, timing, and complications. CONCLUSIONS To the best their knowledge, the authors present the largest reported series of pediatric neurosurgical cases assisted by robotic support. The ROSA system provided improved safety and feasibility of minimally invasive approaches, thus optimizing the surgical result, while minimizing postoperative morbidity.

Authors

  • Alessandro De Benedictis
    Department of Neuroscience and Neurosurgical Unit and.
  • Andrea Trezza
    Department of Neuroscience and Neurosurgical Unit and.
  • Andrea Carai
    Department of Neuroscience and Neurosurgical Unit and.
  • Elisabetta Genovese
    Enterprise Risk Management, Medical Physics Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome.
  • Emidio Procaccini
    Department of Neuroscience and Neurosurgical Unit and.
  • Raffaella Messina
    Department of Neuroscience and Neurosurgical Unit and.
  • Franco Randi
    Department of Neuroscience and Neurosurgical Unit and.
  • Silvia Cossu
    Department of Neuroscience and Neurosurgical Unit and.
  • Giacomo Esposito
    Department of Neuroscience and Neurosurgical Unit and.
  • Paolo Palma
    DPUO, University Department of Pediatrics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital and University of Tor Vergata School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
  • Paolina Amante
    Department of Neuroscience and Neurosurgical Unit and.
  • Michele Rizzi
    "Claudio Munari" Center for Epilepsy Surgery, Niguarda Hospital, Milan; and.
  • Carlo Efisio Marras
    Department of Neuroscience and Neurosurgical Unit and.