Identifying predictive features of autism spectrum disorders in a clinical sample of adolescents and adults using machine learning.

Journal: Scientific reports
PMID:

Abstract

Diagnosing autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is a complicated, time-consuming process which is particularly challenging in older individuals. One of the most widely used behavioral diagnostic tools is the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Previous work using machine learning techniques suggested that ASD detection in children can be achieved with substantially fewer items than the original ADOS. Here, we expand on this work with a specific focus on adolescents and adults as assessed with the ADOS Module 4. We used a machine learning algorithm (support vector machine) to examine whether ASD detection can be improved by identifying a subset of behavioral features from the ADOS Module 4 in a routine clinical sample of N = 673 high-functioning adolescents and adults with ASD (n = 385) and individuals with suspected ASD but other best-estimate or no psychiatric diagnoses (n = 288). We identified reduced subsets of 5 behavioral features for the whole sample as well as age subgroups (adolescents vs. adults) that showed good specificity and sensitivity and reached performance close to that of the existing ADOS algorithm and the full ADOS, with no significant differences in overall performance. These results may help to improve the complicated diagnostic process of ASD by encouraging future efforts to develop novel diagnostic instruments for ASD detection based on the identified constructs as well as aiding clinicians in the difficult question of differential diagnosis.

Authors

  • Charlotte Küpper
    Department of Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. charlotte.kuepper@charite.de.
  • Sanna Stroth
    Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
  • Nicole Wolff
    Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Florian Hauck
    Department of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Natalia Kliewer
    Department of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Tanja Schad-Hansjosten
    Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Inge Kamp-Becker
    Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
  • Luise Poustka
    Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Göttingen, von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
  • Veit Roessner
    Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany; German Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DZKJ), partner site Leipzig/Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Katharina Schultebraucks
    Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Stefan Roepke
    Department of Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. stefan.roepke@charite.de.