AI Medical Compendium Journal:
The Behavioral and brain sciences

Showing 1 to 10 of 76 articles

Quo vadis, planning?

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Deep meta-learning is the driving force behind advances in contemporary AI research, and a promising theory of flexible cognition in natural intelligence. We agree with Binz et al. that many supposedly "model-based" behaviours may be better explained...

Meta-learning as a bridge between neural networks and symbolic Bayesian models.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Meta-learning is even more broadly relevant to the study of inductive biases than Binz et al. suggest: Its implications go beyond the extensions to rational analysis that they discuss. One noteworthy example is that meta-learning can act as a bridge ...

The hard problem of meta-learning is what-to-learn.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Binz et al. highlight the potential of meta-learning to greatly enhance the flexibility of AI algorithms, as well as to approximate human behavior more accurately than traditional learning methods. We wish to emphasize a basic problem that lies under...

Beyond integrative experiment design: Systematic experimentation guided by causal discovery AI.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Integrative experiment design is a needed improvement over ad hoc experiments, but the specific proposed method has limitations. We urge a further break with tradition through the use of an enormous untapped resource: Decades of causal discovery arti...

Implications of capacity-limited, generative models for human vision.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Although discriminative deep neural networks are currently dominant in cognitive modeling, we suggest that capacity-limited, generative models are a promising avenue for future work. Generative models tend to learn both local and global features of s...

Even deeper problems with neural network models of language.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
We recognize today's deep neural network (DNN) models of language behaviors as engineering achievements. However, what we know intuitively and scientifically about language shows that what DNNs are and how they are trained on bare texts, makes them p...

Statistical prediction alone cannot identify good models of behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
The dissociation between statistical prediction and scientific explanation advanced by Bowers et al. for studies of vision using deep neural networks is also observed in several other domains of behavior research, and is in fact unavoidable when fitt...

Thinking beyond the ventral stream: Comment on Bowers et al.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Bowers et al. rightly emphasise that deep learning models often fail to capture constraints on visual perception that have been discovered by previous research. However, the solution is not to discard deep learning altogether, but to design stimuli a...

Neural networks, AI, and the goals of modeling.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have found many useful applications in recent years. Of particular interest have been those instances where their successes imitate human cognition and many consider artificial intelligences to offer a lens for understandi...

Where do the hypotheses come from? Data-driven learning in science and the brain.

The Behavioral and brain sciences
Everyone agrees that testing hypotheses is important, but Bowers et al. provide scant details about where hypotheses about perception and brain function should come from. We suggest that the answer lies in considering how information about the outsid...