AIMC Topic: Editorial Policies

Clear Filters Showing 11 to 20 of 41 articles

Of editorial processes, AI models, and medical literature: the Magnetic Resonance Audiometry experiment.

European radiology
The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of medical research is unquestionable. Nevertheless, the scientific community has raised several concerns about a possible fraudulent use of these tools that might be used to generate inaccur...

Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor.

Journal of medical Internet research
The ethics of generative artificial intelligence (AI) use in scientific manuscript content creation has become a serious matter of concern in the scientific publishing community. Generative AI has computationally become capable of elaborating researc...

The Peer Review System: A Journal Editor's 30-Year Perspective.

Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery
The peer review system has become the standard by which scientific articles are refereed. Unfortunately, even from its beginnings in the mid-1800s it has been fraught with difficulties. Potential reviewers are volunteers who may be inundated with req...

Let's be fair. What about an AI editor?

Accountability in research
Much of the current attention on artificial intelligence (AI)-based natural language processing (NLP) systems has focused on research ethics and integrity but neglects their roles in the editorial and peer-reviewing process. We argue that the academi...

Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers.

Accountability in research
ChatGPT, a chatbot released by OpenAI in November 2022, has rocked academia with its capacity to generate papers "good enough" for academic journals. Major journals such as and professional societies such as the World Association of Medical Editors ...