AIMC Topic: Publishing

Clear Filters Showing 41 to 50 of 137 articles

An artificial intelligence tool misclassifies sport science journals as predatory.

Journal of science and medicine in sport
OBJECTIVES: The choice of a scholarly journal, as opposed to a predatory journal, might impact a sport scientist's career negatively if the wrong choice is made, especially at an early stage of their research and publishing careers. Artificial intell...

The endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study.

BMC medical research methodology
BACKGROUND: Complete reporting is essential for clinical research. However, the endorsement of reporting guidelines in radiological journals is still unclear. Further, as a field extensively utilizing artificial intelligence (AI), the adoption of bot...

Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
BACKGROUND: In the rapid evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI), scientific publishing is experiencing significant transformations. AI tools, while offering unparalleled efficiencies in paper drafting and peer review, also introduce notab...

identifies gender disparities in scientific peer review.

eLife
The peer review process is a critical step in ensuring the quality of scientific research. However, its subjectivity has raised concerns. To investigate this issue, I examined over 500 publicly available peer review reports from 200 published neurosc...

The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing.

Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into academic research writing has revolutionized the field, offering powerful tools like ChatGPT and Bard to aid researchers in content generation and idea enhancement. We explore the curren...

Enhancing scholarly discourse in the age of artificial intelligence: A guided approach to effective peer review process.

La Tunisie medicale
The integrity of the peer-review process (PRP) is paramount in academic publishing and serves as a critical filter for scholarly output. This mini-review centers on the introduction of comprehensive guidelines, presented in tables format, aimed at st...

Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications.

Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia)
This statement revises our earlier "WAME Recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in Relation to Scholarly Publications" (January 20, 2023). The revision reflects the proliferation of chatbots and their expanding use in scholarly publishing over the l...