Effect of Cumulative Exposure on the Efficacy of Paroxetine: A Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic and Machine Learning Analyses.

Journal: CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology
Published Date:

Abstract

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used in depression treatment. However, the relationship between treatment efficacy and plasma concentrations remains unclear. We assessed whether the anti-depressive response can be predicted based on the pharmacokinetic (PK) data of paroxetine, a frequently used SSRI. During treatment, we measured the plasma paroxetine concentrations in 179 paroxetine-treated patients with major depressive disorder. Of these patients, 50 patients had received a pre-treatment personality assessment using the Temperament and Character Inventory at baseline, and their depression severity was assessed using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline and 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after treatment initiation. We conducted population PK modeling followed by a population PK-pharmacodynamic (popPK/PD) model to analyze the enhancement in depression severity until 6 weeks of paroxetine treatment using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Additionally, we developed machine learning models to predict the likelihood of remission after 6 weeks. The contribution of each feature to the prediction was explained using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The area under the plasma paroxetine concentration-time curve during the first week (AUC) and MADRS score after 1 week of treatment (MADRS) were incorporated into the popPK/PD model. The SHAP values indicated that the AUC and MADRS were the significant predictors of remission. Our results indicate that therapeutic responsiveness to paroxetine can be anticipated from its cumulative exposure, highlighting the clinical relevance of assessing SSRI blood concentrations.

Authors

  • Keiichi Shigetome
    Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Tomoko Egashira
    Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Tetsu Tomita
    Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan.
  • Nagisa Higa
    Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Kazuma Iwashita
    Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Kazuya Morita
    Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Miki Nishimura
    Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Tetsuya Kaneko
    Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Hitoshi Maeda
    Department of Biopharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Kazunori D Yamada
    Artificial Intelligence Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2-4-7 Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-0064, Japan.
  • Ayami Kajiwara-Morita
    Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Kentaro Oniki
    Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Norio Yasui-Furukori
    Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
  • Junji Saruwatari
    Division of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.