A novel potential biomarker panel to diagnose depression derived from big proteomic data.

Journal: Journal of affective disorders
Published Date:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is still no clinical biomarker to diagnose depression. Given the complexity of a multifactorial disease like depression, a single biomarker is unlikely to capture the full heterogeneity of the disease and be applicable in clinical practice, mandating biomarker panels representing several biological targets. METHODS: We examined two proteomic datasets from the UK Biobank: the Cox dataset (N = 19,632) and the diagnostic dataset (N = 19,374). Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to identify potential biomarkers of depression within the Cox dataset, and subsequently the diagnostic accuracy of these candidate biomarkers was validated in the diagnostic dataset. Employing four distinct machine learning algorithms and LASSO regression model, we discovered the most effective biomarker panel for depression, assessing model performance through five-fold cross-validation and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 14 years, 46 plasma proteins were significantly associated with depression after adjusting for confounders. These depression-related proteins were involved in immune-related processes and pathways. When combined with traditional risk factors, the six blood protein biomarkers identified in this study achieved 75.4 % diagnostic accuracy for depression, which was similar to using 46 (maximum 74.9 %) and 2911 (maximum 75.9 %) proteins. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the potential clinical use of proteomic biomarkers as complementary information for early and population-based detection of depression. With appropriate clinical and experimental validation, the identified depression-related proteins may be used as a biomarker panel for the screening and prediction of depression.

Authors

  • Simeng Ma
    Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
  • Huawei Tan
    School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China.
  • Mengyuan Zhang
    The Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No.1, Eastern Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan Province, China (K.Q., D.Y., Y.Z., M.Z., W.Z., J.Z., B.Y., J.G., J.L.).
  • Zhaowen Nie
    Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Enqi Zhou
    Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Honggang Lv
    Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
  • Qian Gong
    Department of Psychiatry, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
  • Zhiyi Hu
    School of Information Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Wei Wang
    State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China.
  • Jun Yang
    Cardiovascular Endocrinology Laboratory, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Zhongchun Liu
    Department of PsychiatryRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University Wuhan 430074 China.