Double-blind peer review is considered a pillar of academic research because it is perceived to ensure a fair, unbiased, and fact-centered scientific discussion. Yet, experienced researchers can often correctly guess from which research group an anon...
Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice
37335338
This editorial examines the implications of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, on the authorship and authority of academic papers, and the potential ethical concerns and challenges in health profe...
International journal of surgery (London, England)
37318857
Artificial intelligence technologies were developed to assist authors in bettering the organization and caliber of their published papers, which are both growing in quantity and sophistication. Even though the usage of artificial intelligence tools i...