Machine learning helps identifying volume-confounding effects in radiomics.
Journal:
Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)
PMID:
32088562
Abstract
Highlighting the risk of biases in radiomics-based models will help improve their quality and increase usage as decision support systems in the clinic. In this study we use machine learning-based methods to identify the presence of volume-confounding effects in radiomics features. Methods 841 radiomics features were extracted from two retrospective publicly available datasets of lung and head neck cancers using open source software. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA) identified relations between radiomics and clinical outcomes (overall survival). Bootstrapping techniques with logistic regression verified features' prognostic power and robustness. Results Over 80% of the features had large pairwise correlations. Nearly 30% of the features presented strong correlations with tumor volume. Using volume-independent features for clustering and PCA did not allow risk stratification of patients. Clinical predictors outperformed radiomics features in bootstrapping and logistic regression. Conclusions The adoption of safeguards in radiomics is imperative to improve the quality of radiomics studies. We proposed machine learning (ML) - based methods for robust radiomics signatures development.
Authors
Keywords
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Cluster Analysis
Databases, Factual
Decision Support Systems, Clinical
Female
Humans
Laryngeal Neoplasms
Lung Neoplasms
Machine Learning
Male
Middle Aged
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
Principal Component Analysis
Radiometry
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Software
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
Tomography, X-Ray Computed