AI Medical Compendium Topic

Explore the latest research on artificial intelligence and machine learning in medicine.

Systematic Reviews as Topic

Showing 61 to 70 of 193 articles

Clear Filters

CURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS DEMONSTRATE POTENTIAL IN AUTOMATED CERVICAL VERTEBRAL MATURATION STAGE CLASSIFICATION BASED ON LATERAL CEPHALOGRAMS.

The journal of evidence-based dental practice
ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Neural networks for classification of cervical vertebrae maturation: a systematic review. Mathew R, Palatinus S, Padala S, Alshehri A, Awadh W, Bhandi S, Thomas J, Patil S. Angle Orthod. 2022 Nov 1;92(6):7...

Robotic beyond total mesorectal excision (TME) for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review protocol.

BMJ open
INTRODUCTION: The surgical treatment for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer requires oncological clearance with a pelvic exenteration or a beyond total mesorectal excision (TME). The aim of this systematic review is to explore the safety and...

Systematic review using a spiral approach with machine learning.

Systematic reviews
With the accelerating growth of the academic corpus, doubling every 9 years, machine learning is a promising avenue to make systematic review manageable. Though several notable advancements have already been made, the incorporation of machine learnin...

Cocreating an Automated mHealth Apps Systematic Review Process With Generative AI: Design Science Research Approach.

JMIR medical education
BACKGROUND: The use of mobile devices for delivering health-related services (mobile health [mHealth]) has rapidly increased, leading to a demand for summarizing the state of the art and practice through systematic reviews. However, the systematic re...

Inter-reviewer reliability of human literature reviewing and implications for the introduction of machine-assisted systematic reviews: a mixed-methods review.

BMJ open
OBJECTIVES: Our main objective is to assess the inter-reviewer reliability (IRR) reported in published systematic literature reviews (SLRs). Our secondary objective is to determine the expected IRR by authors of SLRs for both human and machine-assist...

Can large language models replace humans in systematic reviews? Evaluating GPT-4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer-reviewed and grey literature in multiple languages.

Research synthesis methods
Systematic reviews are vital for guiding practice, research and policy, although they are often slow and labour-intensive. Large language models (LLMs) could speed up and automate systematic reviews, but their performance in such tasks has yet to be ...

What's in a Name? Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in Recommendation Letters Generated by ChatGPT.

Journal of medical Internet research
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence chatbots such as ChatGPT (OpenAI) have garnered excitement about their potential for delegating writing tasks ordinarily performed by humans. Many of these tasks (eg, writing recommendation letters) have social and...

Data extraction for evidence synthesis using a large language model: A proof-of-concept study.

Research synthesis methods
Data extraction is a crucial, yet labor-intensive and error-prone part of evidence synthesis. To date, efforts to harness machine learning for enhancing efficiency of the data extraction process have fallen short of achieving sufficient accuracy and ...

Integrating large language models in systematic reviews: a framework and case study using ROBINS-I for risk of bias assessment.

BMJ evidence-based medicine
Large language models (LLMs) may facilitate and expedite systematic reviews, although the approach to integrate LLMs in the review process is unclear. This study evaluates GPT-4 agreement with human reviewers in assessing the risk of bias using the R...