AIMC Topic: Authorship

Clear Filters Showing 11 to 20 of 68 articles

Human vs machine: identifying ChatGPT-generated abstracts in Gynecology and Urogynecology.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
BACKGROUND: ChatGPT, a publicly available artificial intelligence large language model, has allowed for sophisticated artificial intelligence technology on demand. Indeed, use of ChatGPT has already begun to make its way into medical research. Howeve...

Residency Application Selection Committee Discriminatory Ability in Identifying Artificial Intelligence-Generated Personal Statements.

Journal of surgical education
OBJECTIVE: Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have given rise to sophisticated algorithms capable of generating human-like text. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of human reviewers to reliably differentiate personal statements...

Authorship gender among articles about artificial intelligence in breast imaging.

European journal of radiology
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to investigate the variance of women authors, specifically first and senior authorship among peer-reviewed artificial intelligence-related articles with a specific focus in breast imaging.

Generative AI in medical writing: co-author or tool?

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

Meta-research on reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence: are authors and reviewers encouraged enough in radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging journals?

Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
PURPOSE: To determine how radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging journals encourage and mandate the use of reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence (AI) in their author and reviewer instructions.

Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis.

F1000Research
BACKGROUND: As Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI (GenAI) have become more common in academic settings, it is necessary to examine how these tools interact with issues of authorship, academic integrity, and research metho...

Transparency in research: An analysis of ChatGPT usage acknowledgment by authors across disciplines and geographies.

Accountability in research
This investigation systematically reviews the recognition of generative AI tools, particularly ChatGPT, in scholarly literature. Utilizing 1,226 publications from the Dimensions database, ranging from November 2022 to July 2023, the research scrutini...

A model-independent redundancy measure for human versus ChatGPT authorship discrimination using a Bayesian probabilistic approach.

Scientific reports
The academic and scientific world in general is increasingly concerned about their inability to determine and ascertain the identity of the writer of a text. More and more often the question arises as to whether a scientific article or work handed in...